IO Meter (SSD)
We compared the SSD component of the WD Black² (WD1001X06XDTL) to the industry standards - the Intel 520 Series SSD and the Intel X25-M G2. If you wish to see how the WD Black² compares to other solid state drives, take a look at our Solid State Drive Performance Comparison Guide, which we will be updating shortly.
Throughput (Random Access)
Although the IMFT 60074157 flash memory is capable of delivering a peak read speed of 390 MB/s, the Western Digital Black²'s SSD was only capable of delivering a random read speed of just over 322 MB/s, with a far poorer random write speed of 147 MB/s. This puts it closer to the Intel X25-M G2 in performance, than the newer Intel 520 Series SSD.
While reads are always faster than writes in solid state drives, the results for the smaller accesses may flip if the solid state drive uses a write combine buffer. The small writes appear much faster because they are being accumulated in the write combine buffer (which is usually fast DDR3 SDRAM memory) before being written to the drive itself.
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
322.52 MB/s |
369.16 MB/s |
195.49 MB/s |
- 12.6% |
512 KB Write |
146.98 MB/s |
234.78 MB/s |
102.66 MB/s |
- 37.4% |
4 KB Read |
24.90 MB/s |
55.12 MB/s |
21.36 MB/s |
- 54.8% |
4 KB Write |
50.94 MB/s |
73.07 MB/s |
53.95 MB/s |
- 30.3% |
Random Access Time
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
1.63 ms |
1.42 ms |
2.68 ms |
+ 14.5% |
512 KB Write |
3.57 ms |
2.24 ms |
5.11 ms |
+ 59.5% |
4 KB Read |
0.16 ms |
0.09 ms |
0.19 ms |
+ 92.8% |
4 KB Write |
0.08 ms |
0.06 ms |
0.08 ms |
+ 32.9% |
CPU Utilization (Random Access)
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
1.76% |
0.72% |
0.50% |
+ 145.5% |
512 KB Write |
0.99% |
0.70% |
0.40% |
+ 41.7% |
4 KB Read |
3.60% |
4.99% |
5.98% |
- 28.0% |
4 KB Write |
8.96% |
6.86% |
2.25% |
+ 30.6% |
Throughput (Sequential Access)
Even in the sequential test, the Western Digital Black²'s SSD was significantly slower than the Intel 520 Series SSD. As fast as the IMFT flash memory is, the JMicron JMF667H, which is a quad-channel controller, just cannot catch up with better SSD controllers that have far greater parallelism. The SandForce SF-2281 controller used in the Intel 520 Series SSD, for example, has 8 channels.
Do note the particularly poor small sequential read and write speeds. The WD Black²'s SSD actually performs poorer in these aspects than the Intel X25-M G2.
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
325.48 MB/s |
371.44 MB/s |
262.83 MB/s |
- 12.4% |
512 KB Write |
147.03 MB/s |
234.33 MB/s |
103.32 MB/s |
- 37.3% |
4 KB Read |
37.72 MB/s |
65.13 MB/s |
71.28 MB/s |
- 42.1% |
4 KB Write |
51.72 MB/s |
72.11 MB/s |
57.58 MB/s |
- 28.3% |
Sequential Access Time
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
1.63 ms |
1.41 ms |
2.00 ms |
+ 15.5% |
512 KB Write |
3.57 ms |
2.24 ms |
5.08 ms |
+ 59.2% |
4 KB Read |
0.11 ms |
0.07 ms |
0.06 ms |
+ 65.5% |
4 KB Write |
0.08 ms |
0.06 ms |
0.39 ms |
+ 31.0% |
CPU Utilization (Sequential Access)
Test |
WD Black² |
Intel 520 Series |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
512 KB Read |
1.65% |
0.76% |
0.79% |
+ 117.1% |
512 KB Write |
1.16% |
0.55% |
0.51% |
+ 111.9% |
4 KB Read |
6.07% |
5.59% |
6.67% |
+ 8.7% |
4 KB Write |
8.68% |
6.97% |
5.56% |
+ 24.6% |
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
• The Western Digital Black² Dual Drive |
|
4 |
• Peeking Under The PCB, SSD Controller |
|
5 |
• Testing The Black², Usable Capacities |
|
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
Support us by buying from Amazon.com! |
|
Grab a FREE 30-day trial of Amazon Prime for free shipping, instant access to 40,000 movies and TV episodes and the Kindle Owners' Lending Library! |
<<< Transfer Rate Range, WinBench 99 Test Results : Previous Page | Next Page : IO Meter (HDD) Test Results >>>