Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 10 May 2006
 Toshiba
  http://www.toshib...
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 107893
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Toshiba 120GB MK1234GSX SATA Hard Drive Review
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Testing The Hard Drive!

To test the performance of the Toshiba 120GB MK1234GSX hard drive, we turned to the venerable Disk WinBench 99 Version 2.0 as well as HDTach 3.010.

 

The Test Beds

Processor
1.60GHz Intel Pentium M 725 (Dothan)
Chipset
Intel i855PM
Memory
1GB Kingston PC2700 DDR SDRAM
Graphics Processor
ATI Mobility Radeon 9700
Graphics Driver
ATI Catalyst Ver. 4.9
Graphics Memory
64MB DDR SDRAM
Graphics Bus
AGP 4X
Hard Drives

 

Processor
AMD Athlon XP 1700+ (o/c to 1.9GHz)
Motherboard
ABIT NF7-S Rev. 2.0
Memory
Two 512MB Kingston HyperX DDR SDRAM
Graphics Card
ABIT GeForce4 Ti4200 OTES
Hard Drives
120GB Toshiba MK1234GSX 5400 RPM hard drive
120GB Seagate 7200.7 hard disk
400GB Seagate 7200.8 hard disk

 

WinBench 99 Version 2.0

The maximum platter transfer rate was 36MB/s but this gradually tapered off to a transfer rate of only 21MB/s at the last track. The graph was pretty smooth, with no large dips in transfer rate that may suggest the use of replacement sectors. So, the platter quality appears to be very good.

Here are the rest of the results :-

 
Momentus
7200.1
Momentus
5400.3
Momentus
5400.2
Toshiba
MK1234GSX
Business Disk WinMark 99
8,050 KB/s
9,340 KB/s
6,820 KB/s
27,500 KB/s *
High-End Disk WinMark 99
21,500 KB/s
19,000 KB/s
19,900 KB/s
18,000 KB/s
Disk Access Time
16.8 ms
17.3 ms
16.5 ms
16.9 ms
CPU Utilization
(64KB blocks, maximum transfer rate)
0 % **
2.57 %
0 % **
1.41 %
* This very high result is due to the very large disk cache used in the desktop testbed,
and should not be used to compare with results from the notebook testbed.
** Evidently, CPU utilization cannot be so low.



 

 
   
How To Activate The Samsung Galaxy Gear S Smartwatch Without A Samsung Smartphone
The Next-Generation NVIDIA ION Tech Report
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT Graphics Card Review Rev. 2.0
ATI R600 : What It Means To Us
Mushkin 2GB XP2-5300 Extreme Performance DDR2 Dual Pack Review
Thermalright SI-97 GPU Cooler Mod Guide Rev. 2.1
Icemat 2nd Edition Mouse Pad Review
Microsoft Wireless Notebook Optical Mouse Review
Sunbeam Liquid Neon Review
Definitive Review of the ACE 64MB CompactFlash Card

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.