Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 02 May 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.0
 Discuss here !
 654278
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Audio Files - WAV (Highly Compressible)

Compression Rate

SBC Archiver, WinRK and Squeez are the undisputed champions at compressing WAV files. All three managed to reduce the fileset size by 43-46%. Curiously, WinRK performed best when set to its Fast setting. It actually performed worst at its Maximum setting.

WinZip, WinAce and WinRAR are the second best group. They were able to reduce the fileset size by about 35% at Normal or Maximum settings. WinAce is notable as the only compressor in this group to do so at all settings. WinRAR only managed to reduce the fileset size by about 10.5% at its Fast setting. WinZip only managed the same performance at its Normal setting.

The poorest compressor, by a large margin, was ARJ32 at its Fast setting. It was the only compressor to reduce the fileset size by less than 10%. In fact, it only managed to reduce the size by 2.8%.

 

Compression Speed

ARJ32 at its Fast settings was the fastest compressor of this fileset by a large margin. It was more than twice as fast as gzip, WinZip and WinRAR which were the next fastest compressors. The other compressors were much slower, even at their Fast settings.

There were several oddities in the results. For example, both WinAce and WinRK were fastest at their Normal settings. Also, StuffIt Deluxe was actually faster at its Maximum settings than its Normal settings.

 

 

Compression Efficiency

The compression efficiency rating is a simple way to evaluate the efficiency of each data compressor. This way, we can see which compressor can save the most space in the least time.

Please note that a higher efficiency rating does not mean the compressor is better. It just means the compressor has a better compression-to-speed ratio. A more efficient compressor is, of course, always more desirable than a less efficient one.

When it comes to efficiency, SBC Archiver at its Fast settings was the most efficient compressor of this fileset. This was followed by Squeez at all three settings. Surprisingly, right behind them was WinZip at its Maximum settings.

The most inefficient compressors were WinRK (at Maximum settings) and 7-Zip (at both Maximum and Fast settings).



<<< Max: Conclusion : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Audio Files - MP3 (Poorly Compressible) >>>

 

 
   
Hands On With The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X, R9 Fury X2 & R9 Nano
Samsung EcoGreen F4 (HD204UI) 2 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 400 Tech Report
Save Your Mobile Phone From Theft!
Adobe Lightroom Photo Processing Software Review
ATI Tech Day 2006
Intel Duo Couture Event Coverage
Cooler Master Aerogate II Thermal Controller Review
Modded Radeon 9800SE Vs. GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Comparison
Spam - The Digital Pest

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.