Testing RAID Performance
The performance testing was done using only the Promise FastTrak100 ATA RAID Adapter. There is little or no performance difference between RAID controllers of this class. This is because none of these budget RAID cards or even integrated RAID controller use dedicated processors to process the computations required by RAID 0, 1, and 0 + 1.
All that these cards do is provide the necessary BIOS and software support to make the RAID array bootable. We will compare software and hardware RAID to show you the differences between the two options. The performance difference between PATA and SATA hard disk drives in RAID was not tested as it was not within the scope of this guide.
To test the performance of various RAID setups, we used HD Tach ver. 2.61, SisSandra Disk Benchmark and WinBench 99. Here are the specifications of the testbed :
Processor |
600 MHz Intel Celeron II |
|
Motherboard |
ABIT BF6 |
|
System Hard Disk Drive |
15 GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 40 |
|
RAID Array Hard Disk Drives |
Two 20 GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 60 |
The following RAID setups were used for all the tests :-
- Normal (No RAID)
- Software Span
- Hardware Span (JBOD)
- Mirror (RAID 0)
- Software Stripe (RAID 1)
- Hardware Stripe (RAID 1) with stripe sizes (KB) of 2, 4, 8, 16, 64, 128, 256, 512 and 1024
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topics |
|
|
1 |
|||
2 |
|||
3 |
• RAID 0 |
||
4 |
• RAID 1 |
||
5 |
|||
6 |
• RAID 5 |
||
7 |
|||
8 |
|||
9 |
|||
10 |
|||
11 |
|||
12 |
|||
13 |
|||
14 |
|||
15 |
|||
16 |
|||
17 |
|||
18 |
|||
19 |
|||
20 |
|||
21 |
|||
22 |
<<< RAID 5 : Previous Page | Next Page : Sisoft Sandra Disk Benchmark - Overall Score & Buffered Read >>>