Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 10 November 2015
 N/A
  N/A
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 2865
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
4 TB Western Digital Blue Solid State Hybrid Drive (SSHD) Review
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

IO Meter

We compared the 4 TB Western Digital Blue (WD40E31X) SSHD to the 4 TB Western Digital Red (WD40EFRX). For more performance comparisons, please take a look at The Hard Disk Drive Performance Comparison Guide.

If you like this article, please share it! ->

 

Throughput (Random Access)

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

24.07 MB/s

17.72 MB/s

+ 35.8%

512 KB Write

44.45 MB/s

20.57 MB/s

+ 116.1%

4 KB Read

0.25 MB/s

0.25 MB/s

-

4 KB Write

0.62 MB/s

0.23 MB/s

+ 169.6%

The small random reads and writes are the most important tests for applications that make a lot of random accesses, so those would be key performance indicators for drives that are used as boot or system drives, but not very important for NAS or media storage drives.

The 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD was a LOT faster than the 4 TB Western Digital Red, especially in random writes. It enjoyed a significant boost in its large read speed but none in small random reads. It's fascinating to see how a small 8 GB flash cache can improve write performance so much.

 

Random Access Time

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

21.77 ms

29.58 ms

- 26.4%

512 KB Write

11.79 ms

25.47 ms

- 53.7%

4 KB Read

16.47 ms

16.33 ms

+ 0.8%

4 KB Write

6.65 ms

17.54 ms

- 62.1%

The significantly lower random access time was entirely due to the flash memory cache, because the 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD uses the same platter (with the same areal density) as the 4 TB Western Digital Red.

 

CPU Utilization (Random Access)

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

0.62%

0.26%

+ 138.5%

512 KB Write

0.92%

0.33%

+ 178.8%

4 KB Read

0.43%

0.29%

+ 48.3%

4 KB Write

0.93%

2.11%

- 55.9%

Although we generally don't bother much about CPU utilization in the age of quad-core processors, it's interesting to note that the 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD uses 2-3x more CPU time than the 4 TB Western Digital Red.

 

 

Throughput (Sequential Access)

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

161.40 MB/s

145.68 MB/s

+ 10.8%

512 KB Write

158.50 MB/s

145.47 MB/s

+ 9.0%

4 KB Read

51.29 MB/s

51.40 MB/s

- 0.2%

4 KB Write

46.09 MB/s

40.15 MB/s

+ 14.8%

These are the second most important tests for boot drives, and the most important tests for secondary storage drives. The large sequential transfer performance is particularly important because they are often used to store large game or media files, which are all practically larger than than 512 KB these days.

It comes to no surprise that the 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD is faster than the 4 TB Western Digital Red. However, the performance advantage is much smaller when it came to sequential accesses. This is likely due to the relatively limited performance of the 4-channel JMF608 flash controller, which is limited to 150 MB/s (read) and 100 MB/s (write).

 

Sequential Access Time

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

3.25 ms

3.60 ms

- 9.8%

512 KB Write

3.31 ms

3.60 ms

- 8.1%

4 KB Read

0.08 ms

0.08 ms

- 0.9%

4 KB Write

0.09 ms

0.10 ms

- 11.7%

 

CPU Utilization (Sequential Access)

Test

  WD Blue SSHD 
(4 TB)

       WD Red     
(4 TB)

Difference

512 KB Read

1.07%

0.64%

+ 67.2%

512 KB Write

1.60%

0.81%

+ 97.5%

4 KB Read

8.49%

8.38%

+ 1.3%

4 KB Write

10.60%

8.02%

+ 32.2%

Even when it comes to sequential accesses, the 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD still used a lot more CPU time than the 4 TB Western Digital Red. But the difference is much smaller, not that it really matters with high-performance processors we use today.

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

Page

4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD Review

1

Introduction, Specifications, Packaging

2

The 4 TB Western Digital Blue SSHD
SSHD Vs. Dual Drive

3

Peeking Under The PCB

4

Testing The 4 TB WD Blue SSHD
Usable Capacity, Max. Temperature

5

Transfer Rate Range, Platter Profile
WinBench 99 Test Results

6

IO Meter Test Results

7

IOPS Scaling (Random Access)

8

IOPS Scaling (Sequential Access)

9

Conclusion, Lowest Price

Support us by buying from Amazon.com!

Grab a FREE 30-day trial of Amazon Prime for free shipping, instant access to 40,000 movies and TV episodes and the Kindle Owners' Lending Library!


 
   
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano Technology Report
Seagate 250 GB Momentus 5400.4 SATA Notebook Hard Drive Review Rev. 1.1
Western Digital 500 GB Caviar GP Hard Drive Review
My Thoughts On The Sony PlayStation 3
Empire23's Xmas 2006 Wish List
Corsair XMS2-8500 DDR2 Memory Pictorial Review
Secure Your Wireless Network
ASUS W5000A Notebook Overview
Micron Rev5B "C" Memory Module Review

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.