Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 15 December 2009
 N/A
  N/A
 CPU
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 88790
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition Processor Review
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

CINEBENCH R10

The MAXON CINEBENCH R10 is based on their MAXON CINEMA 4D software. Other than being famous for their prolific use of capital letters, MAXON is also famous for providing the useful CINEBENCH benchmark, now in its tenth release. It is fully-optimized for multi-core processing and is thus the favourite benchmark of processor companies.

CINEBENCH tests the speed of the processors in rendering a 3D scene with the option to render on a single processing core or all available processing cores. So, it's great for demonstrating the performance difference of single core processors vs. multi-core processors. We obtained the results in form of the render time in seconds. A shorter render time is always better.

The new Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition is the obvious leader in this test. It rendered the complex 3D scene in just 45 seconds. That's 2 seconds (4.4%) faster than the Core i7-965 Extreme Edition and 12 seconds (27%) faster than the Core i7-920.

It is interesting to note the difference in the multi-core to single-core performance ratio of the processors in this comparison. While Intel Core 2 processors have a ratio of roughly 3.5x for quad-cores and 1.9x for dual-cores, the Intel Core i7-900 series of processors all have ratios of 4x to 4.2x! That means the Core i7 processors are most efficient when all four cores are being utilized.

That is something no quad-core Core 2 processor is capable of. The quad-core Core 2 processors only have a ratio of 3.5x to 3.6x. Only the dual-core Core 2 processors, with their ratio of 1.9x, can come close to the efficiency of the Core i7 processor.

This increased efficiency can be attributed to its support of HyperThreading, which allows the Core i7 processor to process up to 8 threads simultaneously. Thus, for multi-threaded applications, the Core i7 processor is about 17 % more efficient than the quad-core Core 2 processor, and 8 % more efficient than the dual-core Core 2 processor.

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

Page

Topic


1

Intel Core i7-975 EE Overview

2

Introduction
Packaging

3

The Intel Core i7-975 Extreme Edition Processor
Processor Specifications

4

Intel Turbo Mode Technology
DDR3 Memory Controller

5

The Delta DBX-A Cooler
Cooler Specifications

6

Testing The Intel Core i7-975 EE

7

Left 4 Dead Benchmark Results

8

Crysis Warhead Benchmark Results

9

CINEBENCH R10 Benchmark Results

10

x264 HD Benchmark 3.0 Results

11

Super PI Benchmark Results

12

Conclusion
Pros & Cons



 
   
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Technology Report Rev. 1.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Tech Report
The October '07 Samsung-Tech ARP Bloggers TT Program Rev. 4.0
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Tech Myths B.U.S.T.E.D. Rev. 1.3
APIOTEK 12-in-1 Express Card Adapter Pictorial Review
Seagate Momentus 5400.2 Notebook Hard Drive Review Rev. 2.1
Spire CoolGate Pentium 4 Heatpipe Cooler Review
Logitech Z-640 5.1 Speaker Set Review Rev. 1.1
Titan Graphics Card Cooler Review

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.