WinBench 99 Version 2.0
Business Disk WinBench 99
The 3 TB Western Digital Caviar Green did well in this test, delivering a 6.7% better throughput than the older 3 TB Caviar Green. However, it was still significantly slower than the 2 TB Western Digital Caviar Green AFT and the 2 TB Western Digital Caviar Black.
Hard Disk Drive Model |
Capacity |
Business Disk |
Difference |
Useful Links |
|
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT |
2 TB |
22.1 MB/s |
+ 35.6% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Black (6 Gbps) |
2 TB |
20.0 MB/s |
+ 22.7% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT (6 Gbps) |
3 TB |
16.3 MB/s |
Baseline |
- |
|
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT |
3 TB |
15.2 MB/s |
- 6.7% |
||
Western Digital RE4-GP |
2 TB |
13.3 MB/s |
- 18.4% |
||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 |
1 TB |
13.3 MB/s |
- 18.4% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Black |
1 TB |
13.1 MB/s |
- 19.6% |
||
Western Digital AV-GP |
2 TB |
12.2 MB/s |
- 25.2% |
||
Samsung EcoGreen F2 |
1.5 TB |
12.0 MB/s |
- 26.4% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Green |
2 TB |
11.1 MB/s |
- 31.9% |
||
High-End Disk WinBench 99
It actually did better in the High-End Disk WinMark 99 test, coming at at second place, just behind the 2 TB Western Digital Caviar Black - a 7200 RPM hard disk drive.
Hard Disk Drive Model |
Capacity |
Business Disk |
Difference |
Useful Links |
|
Western Digital Caviar Black (6 Gbps) |
2 TB |
126.0 MB/s |
+ 17.8% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT (6 Gbps) |
3 TB |
107.0 MB/s |
Baseline |
- |
|
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT |
3 TB |
102.0 MB/s |
- 4.7% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Green AFT |
2 TB |
101.0 MB/s |
- 5.6% |
||
Western Digital RE4-GP |
2 TB |
73.4 MB/s |
- 31.4% |
||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 |
1 TB |
69.9 MB/s |
- 34.7% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Black |
1 TB |
68.2 MB/s |
- 36.3% |
||
Western Digital AV-GP |
2 TB |
64.9 MB/s |
- 39.3% |
||
Samsung EcoGreen F2 |
1.5 TB |
59.4 MB/s |
- 44.5% |
||
Western Digital Caviar Green |
2 TB |
48.8 MB/s |
- 54.4% |
||
Transfer Rate Range
This chart shows you the range of platter-to-buffer transfer rates from the innermost track to the outermost track. In other words, it shows you the range of disk transfer rates of the hard drives (from minimum and maximum).
The new WD30EZRX is definitely faster than the older WD30EZRSDTL, or at least our first-generation model. As both models use 4 platters with the same areal density, therefore, the only reason for the higher throughput is a higher spindle speed. The good news is Western Digital apparently quitely increased the spindle speed for current WD30EZRSDTL drives as well.
The increase in spindle speed puts the new 3 TB Caviar Green a tad ahead of the older 2 TB Western Digital Caviar Green AFT hard disk drive. Both these drives have the same throughput at the outer tracks, but the WD30EZRX won at the end, due to its better performance at the slower inner tracks.
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
• The Improved 3 TB WD Caviar Green |
|
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
• Maximum Surface Temperature |
|
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
<<< Maximum Surface Temperature, Platter Transfer Rate Profile : Previous Page | Next Page : IO Meter Random Access Performance >>>