Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 14 August 2009
 N/A
  N/A
 Technology Report
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 1.0
 Discuss here !
 65045
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
The NVIDIA PhysX Tech Report
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 is NVIDIA's mid-range graphics card. It would give a good indication of the effect GPU acceleration of PhysX has on the actual frame rate for the average NVIDIA graphics card.

Although the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 is significantly slower than the GeForce GTX 280, it still delivered a remarkable boost in frame rate - 42.5 fps at 1280 x 1024. This goes to show just how much spare processing power there is, even in a mid-range card.

Tt 1920 x 1200, it was still capable of delivering a frame rate of 29 fps. That is over 2.3x faster than what the super-fast Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition processor is capable of.

 

CPU Vs. GPU Performance Summary

This summarizes the performance scaling seen when physics calculation is offloaded from Intel's fastest processor to the three NVIDIA graphics card.

Intel Core i7-965
Extreme Edition

NVIDIA GeForce
GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce
GTX 280

NVIDIA GeForce
GTX 260

   1280 x 1024   

1x

4.61x

3.88x

3.29x

1600 x 1200

1x

3.96x

3.11x

2.60x

1920 x 1200

1x

3.74x

2.79x

2.30x

Average

1x

4.10x

3.26x

2.73x

Although NVIDIA claimed that the GeForce GTX 280 would deliver 15x more physics calculations than an Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 processor, that was only if the GeForce GTX 280 was dedicated entirely to accelerating PhysX calculations. In a real world scenario of a gamer using a single card, the effect is not so startling, even if it is still quite remarkable. This is because the graphics card also has to process vertices and apply textures, amongst other things.

On average, the GeForce GTX 280 was about 3.26x faster than the Core i7-965 processor at physics calculations. The dual-GPU GeForce GTX 295 was about 26% faster. Compared to the Core i7-965, it was 4.1x faster. The mid-range GeForce GTX 260 was 16% slower than the GeForce GTX 280 but even so, it was about 2.73x faster than the Core i7-965.

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!


Page

Topic


1

Introduction
What Is PhysX?

2

Why Is Physics Acceleration Important?
What Can Game Physics Do?

3

The Two Physics Engines
Is Physics Better On The CPU Or The GPU?

4

Testing PhysX

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Results
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Results

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Results
CPU Vs. GPU Performance Summary

7

NVIDIA Vs. ATI Comparison
Conclusion



 
   
The Intel Atom x3 (SoFIA) Debuts In The JOI Phone 5 & JOI 7 Lite
The Dell Inspiron 3000 & 5000 Launch Report
Kingston DataTraveler Elite 3.0 USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review Rev. 2.0
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500 GB Portable Hard Disk Drive (USB 3.0) Review Rev. 2.0
Western Digital 500 GB Caviar GP Hard Drive Review
How To Always Save Tab Session In Internet Explorer 7?
Razer Copperhead Gaming Mouse Pictorial Review
Prince Of Persia : Warrior Within Review
Sunbeam Liquid Neon Review
UNIX For Dummies Guide

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.