Add to Reddit
IOPS Scaling
In these tests, we tested the drive's ability to tackle multiple input/output operations. Again, we compared the OCZ RevoDrive to the OCZ Vertex 2 (E). If you wish to see how the OCZ RevoDrive compares to other solid state drives, take a look at our Solid State Drive Performance Comparison Guide.
Do note that these results are based on the average of separate tests using compressible and non-compressible data. This is to address the fact the newer SSD controllers like the SandForce SF-1222 compress data for better performance and lower wear on the memory cells.
4 KB Random Read
Outstanding I/Os |
OCZ RevoDrive |
OCZ Vertex 2 (E) |
Difference |
1 |
5,497 IOPS |
5,653 IOPS |
- 2.8% |
8 |
32,153 IOPS |
26,793 IOPS |
+ 20.0% |
32 |
47,507 IOPS |
32,629 IOPS |
+ 45.6% |
4 KB Random Write
Outstanding I/Os |
OCZ RevoDrive |
OCZ Vertex 2 (E) |
Difference |
1 |
19,301 IOPS |
17,324 IOPS |
+ 11.4% |
8 |
49,842 IOPS |
41,211 IOPS |
+ 20.9% |
32 |
53,027 IOPS |
41,173 IOPS |
+ 28.8% |
512 KB Random Read
Outstanding I/Os |
OCZ RevoDrive |
OCZ Agility 2 (E) |
Difference |
1 |
685 IOPS |
388 IOPS |
+ 57.7% |
8 |
788 IOPS |
471 IOPS |
+ 62.6% |
32 |
1,007 IOPS |
463 IOPS |
+ 128.0% |
512 KB Random Write
Outstanding I/Os |
OCZ RevoDrive |
OCZ Agility 2 (E) |
Difference |
1 |
498 IOPS |
274 IOPS |
+ 31.0% |
8 |
531 IOPS |
275 IOPS |
+ 35.4% |
32 |
578 IOPS |
279 IOPS |
+ 47.7% |
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
||
3 |
||
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
||
13 |
||
14 |
||
<<< IO Meter Sequential Access Performance : Previous Page | Next Page : IOPS Scaling (Sequential Access) >>>
