Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 04 February 2011
 N/A
  N/A
 Storage
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.1
 Discuss here !
 79567
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
The HighPoint Rocket 620 Performance Comparison Rev. 2.1
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Results Summary

The HighPoint Rocket 620 obviously runs a poor second place to the Intel ICH10. Even though it uses the Marvel 88SE9128 SATA controller which supports the new SATA 6 Gb/s transfer protocol, it was unable to perform as well as the venerable Intel ICH10's SATA 3 Gb/s controller.

Benchmark

Winner

Difference

High-End Disk WinMark 99

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 60.4%

Business Disk WinMark 99

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 39.6%

Disk Transfer Rate Range

Tie

-

4 KB Random Accesses

Intel ICH10

+ 18.3%

4 KB Sequential Accesses

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 2.0%

512 KB Random Accesses

Intel ICH10

+ 42.9%

512 KB Sequential Accesses

Tie

-

4 KB Random Read (IOPS)

Intel ICH10

+33.5%

4 KB Random Write (IOPS)

Intel ICH10

+18.5%

4 KB Sequential Read (IOPS)

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 0.6%

4 KB Sequential Write (IOPS)

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 0.5%

512 KB Random Read (IOPS)

Intel ICH10

+43.5%

512 KB Random Write (IOPS)

Intel ICH10

+50.2%

512 KB Sequential Read (IOPS)

HighPoint Rocket 620

+ 0.2%

512 KB Sequential Write (IOPS)

Intel ICH10

+ 1.2%

Generally, the Intel ICH10 was much faster than the HighPoint Rocket 620 in random accesses. The Rocket 620 was only equal to, or slightly better than, the Intel ICH10 in sequential accesses.

However, the Rocket 620's barely noticeable advantage in sequential access performance is completely overshadowed by its much poorer performance in random accesses. Oddly enough, the Rocket 620 was much faster than the Intel ICH10 in the real-world WinBench 99 tests.

We summarized the benchmark results in the table on the right for your convenience.

Understandably, Western Digital's main concern is to get the full 3 TB capacity fully accessible, not to ensure optimal performance. Besides, this is a Caviar Green drive, so its target market would be users who want the most storage capacity possible for the least amount of money or power consumed. Anyone who buys a Western Digital Caviar Green drive knows that they would have to sacrifice some performance for all that.

 

What Does This Mean?

As interesting as the results are, they are really only of academic interest at this point. Despite its poor performance, the Rocket 620 (as provided by Western Digital) remains the only way to access the full capacity of the 3 TB Caviar Green (WD30EZRSDTL) hard disk drive. If you want to buy and use the 3 TB Caviar Green hard disk drive, you will have to live with the HighPoint Rocket 620... at least for the moment.

When UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) motherboards hit the market this year, you will be able to switch to the chipset's internal SATA controller. Until then, you will have to live with the HighPoint Rocket 620. Look at the bright side - you can expect an instant performance boost from your 3 TB Caviar Green hard disk drive when you upgrade to a UEFI motherboard!

Until then, you should decide if it's worth upgrading to the WD30EZRSDTL based on current benchmarks. Any benchmark results you see right now will be exactly what you can expect from the Rocket 620 controller. It's not as if the benchmark results were based on the Intel ICH10. So, if you need the extra storage space and feel that the drive is fast enough for your needs, that's reason enough to upgrade.

Of course, for most people, cost is also a consideration, and the WD30EZRSDTL comes at a considerable price premium. It would be cheaper to buy two 2 TB Caviar Green (WD20EARS) drives than a single WD30EZRSDTL. You will have to weigh that against the convenience of storing everything in a single drive, and the lower running cost of a single drive. Caveat emptor!

 

Useful Links

For the full review and benchmark results of the Western Digital Caviar Green 3 TB (WD30EZRSDTL) hard disk drive, click here!

To learn how to properly install the WD30EZRSDTL hard disk drive in Microsoft Windows Vista, click here!

For the lowest current prices on Western Digital Caviar Green hard disk drives, click here!

 

Support Tech ARP!

If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!

Page

Topic

1

The HighPoint Rocket 620
Testing The Rocket 620

2

Disk WinBench 99 Test Results
Disk Transfer Rate Range
Platter Profile Comparison

3

Random Access Performance

4

Sequential Access Performance

5

Random Access IOPS Scaling

6

Sequential Access IOPS Scaling

7

Results Summary
What Does All This Mean?
Useful Links



Questions & Comments

Please feel free to post your questions or comments here!

Date Revision Revision History

30-12-2010

1.0

Initial release.

01-02-2011

2.0

Added the Disk WinBench 99 test results.
Added the Disk Transfer Rate Range results.
Added a Platter Profile Comparison.
Updated the Results Summary.

04-02-2011

2.1

Corrected a problem with the mouse-over display of the platter profile comparison charts.

 
   
Unboxing The ASUS ZenFone 2 Smartphone
Samsung EcoGreen F2 (HD154UI) 1.5 TB Hard Disk Drive Review
The ASUS Eee Box B204 & B206
Lian Li EX-33 Internal HDD Kit Review
Taskbar Shuffle Review
Jetart JACSH1 Graphics Card Cooler Review
Kingston 1GB PC2-5400 HyperX DDR2 SDRAM Dual Channel Memory Kit Review
Far Cry Review
Definitive Review of the Kensington Saddlebag Pro
ARP 5th Anniversary BBQ Party

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.