Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 06 November 2004
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Papercut
 1.1
 Discuss here !
 96225
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Omega Radeon Driver Comparison Rev. 1.1
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

The Test Bed

Processor

2.0GHz Intel Pentium 4 "Northwood"

Motherboard

ASUS P4S533

Memory

One 1GB PC2700 DDR SDRAM module (2.5-3-3-7)

Hard Disks

20GB Seagate Barracuda IDE hard disk (7200 RPM, 2MB cache)

Graphics Card

GeCube Radeon 9600XT
- 500MHz core
- 325MHz memory (650MHz DDR)

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional with SP1

Many gamers are not able to afford (or simply choose not to have) the latest and most powerful hardware, and I am one of them. This test also doubles up as an illustration of how the latest games like Doom 3 and Half Life 2 will perform on a mid-range gaming PC.

 

The Benchmarks

      • Doom 3
      • Counter-Strike: Source
      • 3DMark 2001 SE (build 330)
      • 3DMark 2003 (build 340)
      • Aquamark 3

The games used for benchmarking were Doom 3 and the newly- released CS: Source. For curiosity's sake, I also used three synthetic benchmarks - 3DMark01 SE, 3DMark03 and Aquamark 3. Aquamark yielded some intriguing results, as you will see later on.

 

The Drivers

ATI's Catalyst 4.9 and 4.10 was used for this comparison. Catalyst 4.10 features a new Catalyst Control Centre with what ATI calls "Catalyst AI". This new feature apparently makes use of application-specific optimizations to improve frame rates.

However, the Catalyst AI proved to be of no help in the benchmarks (performance actually decreased slightly in Doom 3). Hence, all results in this comparison are those of Catalyst 4.10 without Catalyst AI. It could be that the AI only helps in actual gameplay and not benchmarks, or perhaps it only yields improved results with superior hardware.

As explained earlier, I am using Omega 2.5.90 on Standard OpenGL, fast write off, and no softmodding options. Special OpenGL results will be included where available.

 

Test Procedures

All factors were kept constant during the testing - monitor refresh at 75Hz, desktop resolution synchronised with game resolution, colour depth at 32 bit, and normal background applications running. All benchmarks ran three times, outliers (scores that were unusually high or low) removed and the average score calculated. Let's take a look at the results.

 



 
   
Western Digital Black² (WD1001X06XDTL) Dual Drive Review Rev. 2.0
Windows Anytime Upgrade For Windows 7 Revealed!
Secret Pre-Release Details On Windows XP Service Pack 3
Missing Resolutions In Crysis
Performance Improvements In Crysis 1.1
The October '07 Samsung-Tech ARP Bloggers TT Program Rev. 4.0
Intel Matrix RAID Guide
Dell Pocket DJ Review
Notebook Purchase Fiasco
GeCube Radeon 9600XT Graphics Card Review

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.