Add to Reddit
Sustained Read Transfer Rate
USB Flash Drive |
Interface |
Large Files |
Small Files |
Average |
Difference |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 3.0 |
80.6 MB/s |
63.5 MB/s |
72.0 MB/s |
Baseline |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 3.0 |
54.6 MB/s |
47.9 MB/s |
51.2 MB/s |
- 28.9% |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 2.0 |
29.4 MB/s |
26.9 MB/s |
28.2 MB/s |
- 60.9% |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
28.3 MB/s |
24.6 MB/s |
26.5 MB/s |
- 63.3% |
Active Media Wink |
USB 2.0 |
27.1 MB/s |
25.2 MB/s |
26.2 MB/s |
- 63.7% |
OCZ Rally 2 |
USB 2.0 |
25.6 MB/s |
24.0 MB/s |
24.8 MB/s |
- 65.6% |
SanDisk Cruzer Micro SDCZ6 |
USB 2.0 |
25.3 MB/s |
23.6 MB/s |
24.5 MB/s |
- 66.0% |
Corsair Flash Voyager |
USB 2.0 |
17.7 MB/s |
16.5 MB/s |
17.1 MB/s |
- 76.3% |
Kingston DataTraveler DT110G |
USB 2.0 |
16.5 MB/s |
15.9 MB/s |
16.2 MB/s |
- 77.5% |
The 64 GB OCZ Enyo was 40% faster than its closest competitor, the Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0. The higher USB 3.0 throughput played a part, but without the Enyo's fast flash memory chips, it wouldn't have done so well.
Sustained Write Transfer Rate
USB Flash Drive |
Interface |
Large Files |
Small Files |
Average |
Difference |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 3.0 |
41.7 MB/s |
22.9 MB/s |
32.3 MB/s |
+ 4.0% |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 3.0 |
39.1 MB/s |
23.0 MB/s |
31.1 MB/s |
Baseline |
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 |
USB 2.0 |
22.1 MB/s |
15.1 MB/s |
18.6 MB/s |
- 40.2% |
OCZ Enyo |
USB 2.0 |
19.1 MB/s |
14.2 MB/s |
16.6 MB/s |
- 46.5% |
Kingston DataTraveler DT110G |
8 GB |
9.2 MB/s |
4.6 MB/s |
6.9 MB/s |
- 77.8% |
SanDisk Cruzer Micro SDCZ6 |
2 GB |
7.1 MB/s |
4.5 MB/s |
5.8 MB/s |
- 81.3% |
Corsair Flash Voyager |
4 GB |
7.7 MB/s |
3.4 MB/s |
5.5 MB/s |
- 82.1% |
OCZ Rally 2 |
2 GB |
5.6 MB/s |
1.6 MB/s |
3.6 MB/s |
- 88.3% |
Active Media Wink |
16 GB |
3.3 MB/s |
2.0 MB/s |
2.7 MB/s |
- 91.5% |
Surprisingly, the Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 managed to squeeze past the 64 GB OCZ Enyo in the write test. Even when we tested both in the USB 2.0 mode, the 64 GB OCZ Enyo was still slightly slower than the DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 flash drive. However, both were very much faster than their competitors.
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
• The 64 GB OCZ Enyo Solid State Drive |
|
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
||
13 |
<<< WinBench 99 Test Results, Transfer Rate Range : Previous Page | Next Page : IO Meter Random Access Performance >>>
