IOPS Scaling
In these tests, we tested the drive's ability to tackle multiple input/output operations. Again, we compared the Western Digital SiliconEdge Blue to the Intel X25-M G2 (34 nm). If you wish to see how the WD SiliconEdge Blue compares to other solid state drives, please take a look at our Solid State Drive Performance Comparison Guide.
4 KB Random Read
Outstanding I/Os |
WD SiliconEdge Blue |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
1 |
4,749 IOPS |
5,214 IOPS |
- 8.9% |
8 |
5,754 IOPS |
28,944 IOPS |
- 80.1% |
32 |
5,655 IOPS |
48,085 IOPS |
- 88.2% |
4 KB Random Write
Outstanding I/Os |
WD SiliconEdge Blue |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
1 |
4,445 IOPS |
13,171 IOPS |
- 66.3% |
8 |
4,538 IOPS |
13,637 IOPS |
- 66.7% |
32 |
4,376 IOPS |
19,098 IOPS |
- 77.1% |
512 KB Random Read
Outstanding I/Os |
WD SiliconEdge Blue |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
1 |
369 IOPS |
373 IOPS |
- 1.6% |
8 |
374 IOPS |
395 IOPS |
- 5.5% |
32 |
375 IOPS |
396 IOPS |
- 5.3% |
512 KB Random Write
Outstanding I/Os |
WD SiliconEdge Blue |
Intel X25-M G2 |
Difference |
1 |
269 IOPS |
196 IOPS |
+ 37.5% |
8 |
279 IOPS |
198 IOPS |
+ 40.8% |
32 |
281 IOPS |
198 IOPS |
+ 42.1% |
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
• Overview |
|
2 |
||
3 |
• The WD SiliconEdge Blue 256 GB SSD |
|
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
||
8 |
||
9 |
||
10 |
||
11 |
||
12 |
<<< IO Meter Sequential Access Results : Previous Page | Next Page : IOPS Scaling (Sequential Access) >>>