Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 02 May 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.0
 Discuss here !
 654254
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

E-Books

Compression Rate

Data Compressors
Original Size (bytes)
Compressed Size (bytes)
Space Saved (bytes)
WinRK
200,009,231
172,471,365
27,537,866
Squeez
200,009,231
175,234,069
24,775,162
WinAce
200,009,231
175,389,641
24,619,590
7-Zip
200,009,231
175,663,088
24,346,143
SBC Archiver
200,009,231
175,963,901
24,045,330
WinRAR
200,009,231
176,932,803
23,076,428
StuffIt
200,009,231
177,915,552
22,093,679
bzip2
200,009,231
178,572,464
21,436,767
WinZip
200,009,231
178,580,526
21,428,705
gzip
200,009,231
178,651,889
21,357,342
ARJ32
200,009,231
190,868,975
9,140,256

Even when it comes to PDF files, WinRK was the best at compression. It was ahead of the rest of the pack by reducing the fileset size to just over 172MB, which is a reduction of 13.8%. The runner-up, Squeez, managed to reduce the fileset size by almost 25MB or 12.4%.

The other data compressors did almost as well, compressing the files by about 11-12%. ARJ32 was the only notable exception. It only managed to compress the PDF files by a paltry 9MB (4.6%).

 

Compression Speed

Data Compressors
Original Size (bytes)
Time (s)
Speed (KB/s)
ARJ32
200,009,231
5.61
35652.3
gzip
200,009,231
12.46
16052.1
WinZip
200,009,231
12.51
15987.9
WinRAR
200,009,231
13.10
15267.9
StuffIt
200,009,231
21.10
9479.1
bzip2
200,009,231
49.26
4060.3
SBC Archiver
200,009,231
79.78
2507.0
Squeez
200,009,231
89.68
2230.3
7-Zip
200,009,231
105.77
1891.0
WinAce
200,009,231
170.00
1176.5
WinRK
200,009,231
519.11
385.3

When it came to compression speed, however, ARJ32 was king. It only took 5.6 seconds to compress the 200MB fileset. It was 2.2X faster than its nearest competitors, gzip, WinZip and WinRAR.

WinRK was, again, the slowest compressor tested. This time, it was especially long. It actually took over 8 minutes to complete the test!

 

Compression Efficiency

The compression efficiency rating is a simple way to evaluate the efficiency of each data compressor. This way, we can see which compressor can save the most space in the least time.

Please note that a higher efficiency rating does not mean the compressor is better. It just means the compressor has a better compression-to-speed ratio. A more efficient compressor is, of course, always more desirable than a less efficient one.

The most efficient data compressor when it comes to this bunch of assorted documents was WinRAR. Its moderately fast compression speed with its good compression ratio allowed it edge past gzip and WinZip to become the efficiency champion for PDF files.

The PDF compression king, WinRK, ended up as the most inefficient compressor in this comparison due entirely to its slow performance. The extremely long time it took to compress the fileset completely offset the amount of space saved.



<<< Fast: Documents : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Fast: Movies - DivX >>>

 

 
   
ASUS P7P55D Motherboard
ATI To Fix Poor Tessellation Performance
The RAID Guide
ATI R600 : What It Means To Us
VIZO Armada RAM Cooler Review
Razer Copperhead Gaming Mouse Pictorial Review
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT Tech Report
Seagate 8GB Photo Hard Drive Review
Launch Of The Dothan
Definitive Review of the Cooler Master ASC-V73 Aero 7

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.