Buy the ARP T-Shirt! BIOS Optimization Guide Money Savers!
 

 02 May 2007
 N/A
  N/A
 Comparisons
 Dr. Adrian Wong
 2.0
 Discuss here !
 654247
 
   
Desktop Graphics Card Comparison Guide Rev. 33.0
Covering 628 desktop graphics cards, this comprehensive comparison allows you ... Read here
BIOS Option Of The Week - Virtualization Technology
Since 1999, we have been developing the BIOS Optimization Guide, affectionately known... Read here
   
Buy The BOG Book Subscribe To The BOG! Latest Money Savers!
Compression Comparison Guide Rev. 2.0
Digg! Reddit!Add to Reddit | Bookmark this article:

Audio Files - WAV (Highly Compressible)

Compression Rate

Data Compressors
Original Size (bytes)
Compressed Size (bytes)
Space Saved (bytes)
SBC Archiver
200,001,146
108,614,920
91,390,254
WinRK
200,001,146
110,780,573
89,224,601
Squeez
200,001,146
112,099,087
87,906,087
WinZip
200,001,146
129,895,905
70,109,269
WinAce
200,001,146
130,013,354
69,991,820
WinRAR
200,001,146
131,057,446
68,947,728
StuffIt
200,001,146
139,204,551
60,800,623
7-Zip
200,001,146
168,437,512
31,567,662
bzip2
200,001,146
169,963,770
30,041,404
gzip
200,001,146
178,899,674
21,105,500
ARJ32
200,001,146
179,136,359
20,868,815

In this test of highly compressible WAV files, the relatively unknown trio of SBC Archiver, WinRK and Squeez remained at the top three places by compressing the fileset to just over 108MB. However, they only managed to further improve their compression rate very slightly. In fact, WinRK actually suffered from a slightly poorer compression rate.

Current favourites like WinRAR, WinAce and StuffIt also showed small improvements in this fileset, even after being set to their maximum settings. However, WinZip showed a tremendous boost in performance. It ended up slightly better than WinAce and WinRAR in this fileset. The other compressors did not do well at the fileset, registering very poor compression rates of 10-15%.

 

Compression Speed

Data Compressors
Original Size (bytes)
Time (s)
Speed (KB/s)
gzip
200,001,146
19.66
10173.2
ARJ32
200,001,146
23.28
8591.3
WinZip
200,001,146
25.98
7698.4
Squeez
200,001,146
30.10
6644.7
bzip2
200,001,146
47.58
4203.6
WinRAR
200,001,146
47.86
4179.0
StuffIt
200,001,146
55.99
3572.2
SBC Archiver
200,001,146
89.66
2230.7
7-Zip
200,001,146
109.69
1823.4
WinAce
200,001,146
132.60
1508.3
WinRK
200,001,146
290.81
687.8

When it comes to compression speed, however, things were quite different. The two poorest compressors, ARJ32 and gzip were the two fastest compressors. gzip was the fastest by far, achieving a compression speed of over 10MB/s while ARJ32 achieved about 8.6MB/s.

WinZip and Squeez were also fast, managing compression speeds of 7.7MB/s and 6.6MB/s respectively. The trio of bzip2, WinRAR and StuffIt were much slower at compression, but they were still reasonably fast, compared to the remaining data compressors.

The compression king in the category, SBC Archiver, proved to be relatively fast at the task, at over 2.2MB/s. While it isn't particularly fast, it is much faster than we expected. In contrast, WinRK, which did almost as well as SBC Archiver at compressing these files, was far slower. In fact, with a maximum compression speed of only 688KB/s, it was the slowest compressor in this fileset.

 

Compression Efficiency

The compression efficiency rating is a simple way to evaluate the efficiency of each data compressor. This way, we can see which compressor can save the most space in the least time.

Please note that a higher efficiency rating does not mean the compressor is better. It just means the compressor has a better compression-to-speed ratio. A more efficient compressor is, of course, always more desirable than a less efficient one.

The most efficient data compressors when it came to WAV files was Squeez. Its tremendous compression rate, third only to SBC Archiver and WinRK, combined with a really fast compression speed allowed it to become the undisputed efficiency champion.

Close behind it was WinZip, which at these settings, proved to be a very able compressor. It had a good compression rate and a really fast compression speed. Little wonder it was close to Squeez in efficiency. In contrast, WinRAR which had a similar compression performance as WinZip was much slower. This relegated it to a distant third spot.

The WAV compression king, SBC Archiver, only managed to stay in the middle of the pack as far as efficiency was concerned. Although it was the best compressor of the bunch, its small performance advantage could not make up for its relatively slow compression speed.

WinRK and 7-Zip were the most inefficient compressors in this fileset. WinRK had a really good compression rate but was exceedingly slow. 7-Zip, on the other hand, had a poor compression ratio and was slow at the job.



<<< Normal: Conclusion : Previous Page   |   Next Page : Max: Audio Files - MP3 (Poorly Compressible) >>>

 

 
   
The BenQ W1080ST+ & W1070+ Launch Event
Microsoft Windows 7 SSD Performance Comparison Rev. 2.1
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Tech Report
Microsoft Internet Explorer 8.0 RTM Details Rev. 4.1
Pre-Launch Details Of The Intel Bloomfield (Nehalem Desktop) Processor
Jetart NC3000 Cool Stand Notebook Cooler Review
Marvell XScale PXA3xx Application Processors Tech Report
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT Graphics Card Review
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT Graphics Card Review Rev. 2.0
ATI X800 Pro Ultra 2X April Fool Joke

 


Copyright © Tech ARP.com. All rights reserved.