IO Meter (Sequential Reads & Writes)
Throughput - Sequential
When it comes to sequential reads though, the VelociRaptor BLFS was 1.8 % faster at 512 KB reads but 6.9 % slower at 4 KB reads.
Access Time - Sequential
The VelociRaptor HLFS was mostly faster than the BLFS at sequential seeks but with an insignificant difference of just 1 %. The VelociRaptor BLFS was only faster at 512 KB reads, albeit with a larger margin of 2 %.
CPU Utilization - Sequential
Page |
Topic |
|
1 |
||
2 |
||
3 |
||
4 |
||
5 |
||
6 |
||
7 |
Support Tech ARP!
If you like our work, you can help support out work by visiting our sponsors, participate in the Tech ARP Forums, or even donate to our fund. Any help you can render is greatly appreciated!